The goal:
- Regularly gather feedback by conducting usability testing with people with disability using a range of assistive technologies;
- Prioritise testing components that are based on the ARIA Authoring Practices Guide (APG) or similar guides.
Before the sessions
The participants
A good approach is to ask for a broad mix of
- mobile and desktop;
- types of disabilities;
- assistive technology.
The scenarios
- Pick a small list of components to test
- Non-native, APG-based, components
- New components since the last round of testing
- Design and make some realistic, but not real, pages using the components
- Do use content and ideas from existing flows and pages
- Don’t use lorem ipsum
- Do include footer navigation for the user to move to the scenarios
- Don’t include navigation that take the user out of the test flow
- Ideally, a designer designs the pages, a developer builds the pages
- As a backup, a design-savvy developer can build the pages.
- So include a handful of patterns that are widely used and/or know to be problematic, to gain insights to share more widely than just the RDS team
- Do use content and ideas from existing flows and pages
- Confirm environment and access
The schedule
- Make a list of good and bad times of day and share with session organisers
- Plan for time to review the script
- Schedule attending sessions as a task during the sprint
- Aim for at least one developer and one designer
- Aim for a minimum of one team member per session
During the sessions
- Take notes to prepare for questions at the end
- Have a short debrief immediately after each session
After the sessions
- Watch the recordings of any missed sessions
- Have a short debrief meeting as a team to share observations and insights
- Make tickets from the issues and recommendations in the report